The DailysweN

Connecting the dots.

Politics: Thursday, 08 Jan 2009

$Multi-trillion Deficits for the Foreseeable Future
$1.2 Trillion for 2009
Obama to Ban Congressional Earmarks
Deficit Could Cause Problems for Obama's Stimulus Plans
Porn Industry Wants $5 Billion Bailout to Help Get it Back on its ... Feet, Back, Whatever

Obama Going for More Regulation
Some Senators Fighting the Threat of the Fairness Doctrine
Bush Tried to Reign in Freddie and Fannie

Interesting Take on the 5 Presidents Meeting

World Leaders Call For New Global Capitalism, Run by the UN


Is There Anything In Chicago That's Not Corrupt?

If Republicans Did the Same Thing, Would it be Called a "Misstep"?

Yet Another President Warns About Social Security...

Medicaid Shows Why We Shouldn't Have Government Healthcare

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Labels

  • Security
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Culture
  • General
  • Environment
  • Media
  • Free Speech
  • Healthcare
  • Religion
  • Tolerance

Contact Your Government "Representatives"

E-mail:
White House
United States Senators
United States House of Representatives
State Representatives

Phone:
White House: 202-456-1414
US Senate and House: 202-224-3121

Quotes from the US Founding Fathers's Fan Box

Quotes from the US Founding Fathers on Facebook

Random Founding Fathers Quote

Latest letter to my representative:

Dear Mr. Bennett-

I am writing to express my concern at Harold Koh's nomination to State Department Legal Advisor. After reading his own comments on his political and legal views, I believe his confirmation would lead to further weakening of the US constitution, and federal adherence to constitutional law. Whether he would intentionally weaken the constitution out of malice may be up for debate, but I believe his basic political views would inevitably lead to this end.

I would like to encourage you to please vote against his confirmation. While many of your peers in the Senate believe a President should be entitled to his nominees, I believe that entitlement only holds true if the nominee will help the president to uphold the constitution. If his nominee prefers international law to constitutional law, as this nominee does, or leans towards any other unconstitutional or treasonous opinion, I believe the Senate must act as the constitutional check and balance to said dangerous nominations.

Thank you for your time.

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Contributors

  • Administrator
  • Privasee

Counter

Free Hit Counter