The DailysweN

Connecting the dots.

Economy: Wednesday, 10 Feb 2010

Budgetary common sense?
So now he wants budget cuts?
Obama to (finally) propose freeze on government spending
Spending religion arrives a year, and trillions of dollars, too late

Obama's answer for America: more of me
Obama's draft budget projects not-yet-passed cap-and-trade revenue
...Later Drops $646 Billion in "Cap-and-Trade" Revenue From Budget

There's still time to rejuvenate our market economy and avoid a European-style welfare state
$1.5 Trillion Ways to Cut the Deficit
'We've got to spend our way out of this recession'
Presidential hyperbole? Obama: "Every economist" says I saved or created 2 million jobs

IRS commissioner doesn't file his own taxes (says it's too complicated)

Dutch to pay per-kilometer tax

Wall St. Weighs Constitutional Challenge to a Proposed Tax
Budget-strapped states avoid the word 'taxes'
The pursuit of happiness: Married Couples Pay More Than Unmarried Under Health Bill
Tax Cuts to Expire for Top Earners - eliminate some mortgage and charitable deductions
Obama seeking tax on biggest banks
...but what about Fed profits?
Dem Congressman introduces 50% tax on bonuses (but what about Fed profits?)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Labels

  • Security
  • Economy
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Culture
  • General
  • Environment
  • Media
  • Free Speech
  • Healthcare
  • Religion
  • Tolerance

Contact Your Government "Representatives"

E-mail:
White House
United States Senators
United States House of Representatives
State Representatives

Phone:
White House: 202-456-1414
US Senate and House: 202-224-3121

Quotes from the US Founding Fathers's Fan Box

Quotes from the US Founding Fathers on Facebook

Random Founding Fathers Quote

Latest letter to my representative:

Dear Mr. Bennett-

I am writing to express my concern at Harold Koh's nomination to State Department Legal Advisor. After reading his own comments on his political and legal views, I believe his confirmation would lead to further weakening of the US constitution, and federal adherence to constitutional law. Whether he would intentionally weaken the constitution out of malice may be up for debate, but I believe his basic political views would inevitably lead to this end.

I would like to encourage you to please vote against his confirmation. While many of your peers in the Senate believe a President should be entitled to his nominees, I believe that entitlement only holds true if the nominee will help the president to uphold the constitution. If his nominee prefers international law to constitutional law, as this nominee does, or leans towards any other unconstitutional or treasonous opinion, I believe the Senate must act as the constitutional check and balance to said dangerous nominations.

Thank you for your time.

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Contributors

  • Administrator
  • Privasee

Counter

Free Hit Counter