Someone Needs to Tell the President His Health Care Plan is Dead
Pelosi: A bill can be bipartisan without bipartisan votes
Truth-squading the summit
"Smaller" health bill?
Obama to add some GOP ideas to plan
Obama Needs to Go Chicago-Style on Health Care
Insurer launches medical marijuana coverage
Connecting the dots.
Labels
Contact Your Government "Representatives"
E-mail:
White House
United States Senators
United States House of Representatives
State Representatives
Phone:
White House: 202-456-1414
US Senate and House: 202-224-3121
White House
United States Senators
United States House of Representatives
State Representatives
Phone:
White House: 202-456-1414
US Senate and House: 202-224-3121
Quotes from the US Founding Fathers's Fan Box
Random Founding Fathers Quote
Latest letter to my representative:
Dear Mr. Bennett-
I am writing to express my concern at Harold Koh's nomination to State Department Legal Advisor. After reading his own comments on his political and legal views, I believe his confirmation would lead to further weakening of the US constitution, and federal adherence to constitutional law. Whether he would intentionally weaken the constitution out of malice may be up for debate, but I believe his basic political views would inevitably lead to this end.
I would like to encourage you to please vote against his confirmation. While many of your peers in the Senate believe a President should be entitled to his nominees, I believe that entitlement only holds true if the nominee will help the president to uphold the constitution. If his nominee prefers international law to constitutional law, as this nominee does, or leans towards any other unconstitutional or treasonous opinion, I believe the Senate must act as the constitutional check and balance to said dangerous nominations.
Thank you for your time.
I am writing to express my concern at Harold Koh's nomination to State Department Legal Advisor. After reading his own comments on his political and legal views, I believe his confirmation would lead to further weakening of the US constitution, and federal adherence to constitutional law. Whether he would intentionally weaken the constitution out of malice may be up for debate, but I believe his basic political views would inevitably lead to this end.
I would like to encourage you to please vote against his confirmation. While many of your peers in the Senate believe a President should be entitled to his nominees, I believe that entitlement only holds true if the nominee will help the president to uphold the constitution. If his nominee prefers international law to constitutional law, as this nominee does, or leans towards any other unconstitutional or treasonous opinion, I believe the Senate must act as the constitutional check and balance to said dangerous nominations.
Thank you for your time.
Posts
Contributors
Counter
No comments:
Post a Comment